Triple y cuádruple hélice

You are here:
< Volver
Referencias bibliográficas sobre la Triple Hélice y Cuádruple Hélice de innovación abierta.


Aspectos teóricos y metodológicos

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3), 201–234.

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2011). Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix—university–industry–government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14Etzkowit, 14–19.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The Endless Transition: A “Triple Helix” of University-Industry-Government Relations. Minerva, 36(3), 203–208.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy,29(2), 109–123.

Farinha, L., Ferreira, J., & Gouveia, B. (2016). Networks of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Triple Helix Case Study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 259–275.

Ferreira, E. J., & Steenkamp, R. J. (2015). The exploration of the triple helix concept in terms of entrepreneurial universities and corporate innovation. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(2), 491–506.

Ivanova, I. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 86, 143–156.

Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2016). “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: can synergy in innovation systems be measured? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 1–12.

Leydesdorff, L., Park, H. W., & Lengyel, B. (2014). A routine for measuring synergy in university-industry-government relations: Mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator. Scientometrics, 99(1), 27–35.

Leydesdorff, L., & Zawdie, G. (2010). The triple helix perspective of innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 789–804.

Luengo, M. J., & Obeso, M. (2013). The triple helix effect on innovation performance. RAE-REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS, 53(4), 388–399.

Lundberg, H. (2013). Triple Helix in practice: the key role of boundary spanners. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(2), 211–226.

Meyer, M., Grant, K., Morlacchi, P., & Weckowska, D. (2014). Triple Helix indicators as an emergent area of enquiry: a bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics, 99(1), 151–174.

Rieu, A.-M. (2014). Innovation today: the Triple Helix and research diversity. Triple Helix, 1(1), 1–22.

Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 123, 142–152.


Gestión del conocimiento y la información

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development.

Kolehmainen, J., Irvine, J., Stewart, L., Karacsonyi, Z., Szabó, T., Alarinta, J., & Norberg, A. (2016). Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy,7(1).

Leydesdorff, L. (2010). The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 367–417.

Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy,3(1), 25–35.

Mêgnigbêto, E. (2015). Effect of international collaboration on knowledge flow within an innovation system: a Triple Helix approach. Triple Helix. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Pinto, H. (2017). Connecting the Triple Helix space: actor-network creation and institutionalisation of knowledge transfer offices. Triple Helix, 4(1), 1.


Estudios de casos y sectoriales

Amir, S., & Nugroho, Y. (2013). Beyond the Triple Helix: Framing STS in the Developmental Context. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(3–4), 115–126.

Biggiero, L. (1998). Italian industrial districts: A Triple Helix pattern of problem solving. Industry and Higher Education, 12(4), 227–234.

Campanella, F., Della Peruta, M. R., Bresciani, S., & Dezi, L. (2017). Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2).

Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 119, 294–309.

Kerry, C., & Danson, M. (2016). Open Innovation, Triple Helix and Regional Innovation Systems: Exploring CATAPULT Centres in the UK. Industry and Higher Education, 30(1), 67.

Khan, G. F., & Park, H. W. (2013). The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels. Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 182–193.

Petersen, A. M., Rotolo, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2016). A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings. Research Policy, 45(3), 666–681.

Rosenlund, J., Rosell, E., & Hogland, W. (2017). Overcoming the triple helix boundaries in an environmental research collaboration. Science and Public Policy, 44(2), 153–162.

Strand, Ø., Ivanova, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Decomposing the Triple-Helix synergy into the regional innovation systems of Norway: Firm data and patent networks. Quality and Quantity, 51(3), 963–988.


Clústers, redes y laboratorios de innovación abierta

Baccarne, B., Logghe, S., Schuurman, D., & Marez, L. De. (2016). Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(3), 22–30.

Baccarne, B., Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. (2015). Facilitating Quintuple Helix innovation with Urban Living Labs. In Proceedings of XXVI ISPIM Conferences(pp. 1–16). Budapest: ISPIM.

Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., & Rehman, S. S. (2016). Mode 3 knowledge production: systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1–24.

Farinha, L., Ferreira, J., & Gouveia, B. (2016). Networks of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Triple Helix Case Study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 259–275.

Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective.Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.

Rosenlund, J., Hogland, W., Johansson, A. W., & Seddon, J. (2015). A cross-national environmental cluster collaboration: Shifting between an analytical and management level of the triple helix. Science and Public Policy, 42(4), 583–593.

Actualizado octubre 23, 2018
Share via